Stripped. Pulped. And Unread.
Somewhere in the depths of the New York Times archive I found a short yet poignant piece of writing. This article, dated September 6th, 1902, is a meditation on the unsold books which eventually wound up in acid vats. The writer’s name is George Owen Koch, but the way he waxes poetic about the parallels between the fate of books and the eventual fate of humankind, you’d think he was Percy Shelley.
And who can blame him? As a self-confessed bibliophile, I certainly can’t; I’ll admit to feeling a little emotional as he traces a book’s journey from a writer’s inspiration to pulp. Books were my refuge during a childhood spent in small town, sports-loving America, and as I’ve grown older I’ve found more and more people who are happy to while away a weekend in a bookstore or a library.
But just like anything else in our society, books are also consumer commodities, and when they’re not within the loving, nerdy embrace of your average book junkie, they are subject to the laws of the jungle like other retail product. Like supermarkets, bookstores often receive more books that they can sell. And like the overstocked food at supermarkets that could potentially nourish thousands if not millions of people, unsold books are simply disposed of, destined to be unconsumed by the countless inquiring minds in the U.S.
So how can so many books end up in dumpsters? Just trying to answer this question requires wading through statistics, corporate policies, industry jargon, and the occasional clandestine interview with a former employee. Let’s start from the first chapter.
Untangling the Plot
The Association of American Publishers reports that in 2005, about 1.5 billion books were shipped in the United States. According to an article on the Bloomberg website, publishers have been encouraging booksellers for decades to keep their shelves well-stocked with books, believing that the more books made available, the more books would be sold.
In theory, that is. As usual, reality doesn’t always stick to the script: the Bloomberg article also mentions that out of those 1.5 billion books, nearly a third were returned to publishers. But this figure doesn’t tell the whole story. Many bookstores, eager to save on shipping costs, don’t actually send the books back. Instead, they tear off the covers of paperbacks – rendering the books “stripped” – and send them back to the publishers as proofs of purchase.
A friend of mine who worked for a large bookstore chain (and who, due to his former employment asked to remain anonymous) put it this way:
So, the covers are torn and sent, but this leaves the rest of the book--the pages, the storylines, the ideas. These all end up in the dumpster, discarded and forgotten. Often, but not always, the coverless books are nonetheless packed and sealed into a box, then thrown into the garbage. This makes the practice more discrete, and makes it feel much more secretive and, frankly, dirty.
It gets even more absurd. My friend also informed me that it was strict corporate policy that the books be thrown away. “There would be no recycling, no donating, no ‘dollar bin’ sales, nothing like that,” he explained. “The garbage was the only option.” This is not just limited to stripped paperbacks either; outdated textbooks are also thrown away, with covers intact. Considering that there are community libraries in different parts of the world that rely entirely on donated textbooks, these policies can only be considered wasteful on a breathtaking scale.
Brainstorming the Next Chapter
Perhaps the most maddening thing about this whole book boondoggle is the lack of any clear explanation for these policies. The friend whom I interviewed was told that throwing away the books was corporate policy, but the reasoning behind the policy remains an enigma. Although the “stripping” of the paperback books makes some sense (to prevent unauthorized sale of a book when the money won’t go to either the publisher or the bookseller), it doesn’t explain why a book that is not selling has to be destroyed instead of, say, donated. Why not send them to one of the afore-mentioned community libraries? Why not give them to a needy library in the U.S.?
But an even more obvious question comes up when looking at the statistics about returned books: why print so many in the first place? That is a question that is finally being brought to light. The Bloomberg article centers around a new imprint of HarperCollins which will distribute books to booksellers on a non-returnable basis. This new HarperCollins imprint joins already existing efforts such as the Green Partnership Program, which sends carbon-neutral, discounted and non-returnable book shipments to 30 independent retailers around the country. There’s still a long way to go before these initiatives significantly change the entire industry, but if fewer books are printed and returned, fewer books are thrown away. It’s a start.
Printing and shipping fewer books is all fine and good, but not entirely satisfying. In Hindu and Muslim societies in South Asia it's considered taboo even to throw books on the floor or dirty them in any way, and yet here in the U.S. the trashing and pulping of books is an ingrained industry practice. Even if books are another commodity at the end of the day, do they have to be so blatantly...commodified? Is there any way we as readers and consumers can have some impact so that books are read and cherished, even if they don't sell within a certain timeframe? There's got to be a way to turn the page on this rather depressing story.
By Justin Shilad
Also in Main Street
Image from Flickr user jurek d. shared with a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Seems backwards
I do love books, and every time I see them with the covers ripped off it does make me feel bad for the book. It does seem with all the advances in supply-chain automation and the rest that book-publishers could get closer to printing something close to what the demand would be..
And don't even get me started on a better way for the left-over books to be "pulped"..
Next steps
Wow, I never thought of this before, certainly a bummer!
I'd love to hear more about efforts to get these books donated, do you plan to do any more research on this and confront the booksellers? It would be cool to hear from the folks at Barnes & Noble or Borders....
Any grassroots efforts to change this?
If not, let's start the revolution.